San Pablo Talk Back

San Pablo, California

  • Our Purpose

    This blog is for us, the people of San Pablo and guests, to share information and concerns about our city, our government, our schools, our neighborhoods, our businesses, our religious centers, and any and all issues we deem important. It is also for us to ‘talk back’ to each other and government about the issues and questions that concern us. We commit to be respectful of each other. There is much we can accomplish working together.
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 23 other followers


Posted by xaviervir on June 18, 2014

Today’s editorial in the West County Times:

Contra Costa Times editorial: Which part of “no” do West Contra Costa school officials not understand?
Contra Costa Times editorial © 2014 Bay Area News Group
POSTED: 06/17/2014 12:48:17 PM PDT1 COMMENT
UPDATED: 06/17/2014 02:15:54 PM PDT

West Contra Costa school board Trustee Charles Ramsey doesn’t understand the meaning of the word “no.”

After the defeat this month of Measure H, district officials’ attempt to pass their seventh bond measure in 17 years, Ramsey claimed voters were saying, “Hey, not right now, but maybe in the future.”

Actually, Mr. Ramsey, the ballot did not have a “ask me later” option. The choices were either yes or no. And 54 percent of voters said no to a school construction program that has spiraled out of control.

They said no to a district that has issued more construction bonds than any California K-12 district except the much larger Los Angeles and San Diego districts. They said no to increasing the program from an already unconscionable $1.6 billion to $1.9 billion.

West County residents, already paying the highest property tax rates in the county, said no to expanding a building program that has no cost controls, in which the projected price of a high school is four times the 2013 median from a survey of the California-Arizona-Nevada-Hawaii region.

And they said no, Mr. Ramsey, to your sleazy leveraging of the school-building program to bolster your political career, most recently to fatten the coffers of your Richmond mayoral campaign with contributions from contractors, architectural firms and labor groups that benefit from the construction.

Voters understand that children deserve good schools. But they also realize that there are trade-offs, that if you tap out taxpayers to build classrooms they won’t be able to help fund teachers.

Unfortunately, Ramsey’s political spin, suggesting that voters might approve more bonds later, appears to be an excuse for continuing the district’s profligate ways.

He doesn’t get it. The voters’ message was clear: It’s time for district officials to start living within a reasonable budget, to practice the sort of financial responsibility we should be modeling for our children.

Of the $1.6 billion of bonding authority already approved, the district has used about $1 billion. It’s time for them to figure out how to complete the program with the balance. After all, Superintendent Bruce Harter, when seeking support for the 2010 measure, said that would be all the district would need. Yet district leaders went back to the well again in 2012 and this year.

This time, voters got smart. They educated themselves. They recognized that they were being conned. Even some members of the bond oversight committee appointed by the school board couldn’t stomach this.

The voters didn’t say “maybe in the future,” they said “enough.” They said “no.”



One Response to “TIME TO DUMP RAMSEY !!”

  1. Thanks for posting this! It’s not just Ramsey that doesn’t know how to say “NO”, but our Dist. 1 Supervisor John Gioia plays the same game.
    Even though West County voters turned down DMC parcel tax Measure C, Gioia continues to crow that “a majority of voters
    supported the tax” showing that he is one of those even now working behind the scenes to change the vote percentage on parcel taxes from a super majority of 66% to 50% a simple majority.]
    What he doesn’t address is the fact that both people who DON’T HAVE TO PAY THE PARCEL TAX get to vote to tax those that do. That’s one of the reasons we have a supermajority rule.
    Actually, I think it would only be fair if only those who have to pay the tax get to vote on the tax.
    Yesterday, the County Board of Supes’ voted for a 4th “parcel tax transfer” to provide bridge financing to keep DMC
    open until a “sustainable model” could be worked out.
    Where have we heard this before??
    Video of meeting:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: